My Baby Has A Sensitive Stomach

Pinochet and the discreet charm of cocaine

most surprising thing about the coverage of the death of Pinochet is under the complete absence of references to his involvement in trafficking of cocaine. El Pais devoted several pages to the death yesterday without mentioning at any time allegations of Manuel Contreras, the right hand of the dictator in their most virulent of Pinochet's repression in his capacity as head of the secret police (the notorious DINA).

We are not talking about cookies middling as those routinely overlook the pages of The World to fan the flames of a particular conspiracy theory crazy, but a high position close to Pinochet, but the mantle silence that has fallen on this story is total. Six years ago the British newspaper The Guardian revealed that the secret police Chilean Army and cocaine had flooded Europe and the U.S. for at least twenty years

"Twelve tons of the drug with a street value of a billion pounds, left Chile, between 1986 and 1987 only. The drugs, destined for Europe, were often sent to English territory in equipment manufactured in Chile carrying weapons bound for Iraq and Iran. The distribution in Britain and other European countries under the control of the secret police, hosted by the embassies of Chile in Stockholm and Madrid. "

Revealed: Pinochet drug smuggling link

In" The Discreet Charm the bourgeoisie ', Luis Buñuel showed an ambassador of a South American country, played by Fernando Rey, who was dedicated to this very thing, but in a much more traditional. In this case we Pinochet himself and some members of his family mired up to their eyeballs in the world's most lucrative business, dealing in large-scale and with impunity, and though this is the best explanation for the origin of fortune found in the Riggs bank accounts, no one seems interested.

is not the first case of a dictator involved in shady business which mixes the drug and arms trafficking, the savage repression of dissent and the friendship of the United States:

"In Bolivia there are studies like that of Federico Aguilo (Banzer father of the mafia. p.52. Trafficking and Violence) and the testimony of another dictator, Garcia Meza, who accuse Hugo Banzer Suarez of being "the father of cocaine in Bolivia" angles of view opposite, that after the 1971 coup and when he began the height of the global cocaine, Banzer established distribution networks as issued then by the conviction of Alberto Sanchez to five years in prison in Canada. It appears that Operation Condor was among others the mission of dealing in cocaine. "

Pinochet, Contreras, Banzer and cocaine

A possible explanation for the blackout would be the farce of the drug fight is with the ass in the air when these issues are uncovered. It is very difficult to try to convince people that using cocaine is financed terrorism when governments continuously violate the conduct alleged against drugs and geostrategic reasons.

More:

Pinochet's fortune comes from the cocaine according to a former subordinate

Why Does Nasal Spray Burn

Delusions of ABC

We thank someone, please read the crap they publish all the media when they talk about drugs. In Malaprensa , Josu Mezo is set in a holder ABC-but it would any other newspaper, which establishes a clear relationship between drug use and violence, as usual, does not appear anywhere in the text. They are the "phenomena" that raise the alarm, but items as expendable, repeated and regrettable as this:

" Drug use is behind the most violent phenomena youth. After such resounding

holder, this great paragraph:

not always, but drug use is associated to much of the most recent phenomena that have raised alarm in English society. Cannabis, ecstasy, cocaine and other substances are the origin, or a factor of many cases of youth violence, bullying in classrooms, vandalism, domestic violence, school failure, traffic accidents and occupational integration difficulties, which have as protagonists many young people, and sometimes people and adults. [Emphasis added]

Now you expect the data from a study, then my criticism of such data is not it? Therefore left with the desire: no study, no data. Neither the owner nor the chapeau have another support this statement: "This is a reality that experts perceive and you can prove." Olé. "

continues at: The ABC is unleashed

More Malaprensa's weblog
FAC Cannabis and crime in El Diario Montanes

How Much Is Daycare Insurance

Malaprensa Science and drugs: the truths of


Druglink In , weblog of the British Association Drugscope, we found a post titled "Smoke, mirrors and the death of Objectivity" ("Smoke, mirrors and the death of objectivity"), where the "findings" of the drogabusología are not very good place. Not that others had not done before , but thanks to a partnership whims anything suspicious antiprohibitionist dares to denounce a situation intolerable. A piece chosen:

"The studies are carefully selected to conform to a pre-determined conclusion.

excess is given to reliability studies a sample of subjects with small or unrepresentative, or ignore other factors that could explain the result.

Some researchers take cover behind a respectable facade of scientific objectivity, but his work printed at his own scale of moral values, with the inevitable outcome for the results.

findings are distorted through the prism of prejudice. Medical journals announced alarming new drug research but for the time they are tabloids, which could have begun as a serious work ends up feeding alarmist headlines.

And, of course, there are outright lies and exaggerations, as the transformation of a potential risk to a small group of users in a real risk for all of them, and so on.

In the primary level, such tactics do not work. During the past 25 years, the use of Class A drugs has soared in the UK despite all the warnings of experts and activists. But beyond this, there is an objective truth about drugs and public has a right to access without any restriction. "

Of course, this phenomenon is not unique to the United Kingdom. We see each other every day, and the collusion between drug agencies, scientists and media accomplices militants has an extraordinary health. Scientific objectivity about drugs is, at present, a chimera.

More:
Cannabis: Where medical debates last a lifetime ... Or maybe more?

Root Beer Shockwave Game

boatman Milton Friedman: goodbye to a pioneer

is dead Milton Friedman, Nobel economist and defender of personal liberty against to state interference. The West likes to boast of his tolerance and respect for freedoms, but the legal status of drugs or prostitution is more typical of an Oriental satrap or totalitarian regimes that routinely derided the alleged democracies in which we live. At this point we can not look over your shoulder to North Korea or Cuba, why we behave just like them.

Like his friend Thomas Szasz, Friedman was right from the beginning of the War on Drugs, in the early seventies, one of his most lucid and fervent critics. Unlike the UN, which predicted eight years ago a drug free world by 2008 , Friedman was right to warn that full at each step in the direction repressive prohibitionist and bring us closer to the abyss. One example is the letter sent in 1990 to then-drug czar, William Bennett

"You are not mistaken in believing that drugs are a curse which is devastating our society. It is not wrong in believing that drugs are destroying the social fabric, ruining the lives of many young people and imposing a heavy cost to the poorest of our society. Not wrong to believe that the majority of the public share your concerns. In short, you're not wrong about the purposes it seeks to achieve.

Su error consiste en no reconocer que son precisamente las medidas que usted favorece la principal causa de los pecados que deplora. Por supuesto que la demanda es el problema, pero no sólo la demanda, sino la demanda que opera a través de la represión y de canales ilegales. La ilegalidad da lugar a obscenas utilidades que financian tácticas homicidas de los capos de la droga; la ilegalidad conduce a la corrupción de funcionarios encargados de aplicar la ley; la ilegalidad monopoliza los esfuerzos de los funcionarios honestos de manera que no cuentan con recursos para combatir delitos más evidentes como los atracos, los hurtos y los asaltos.

Las drogas son una tragedia para los adictos, pero criminalizar su uso o consumo convierte esa estrategia en un desastre para la sociedad, para los usuarios y los no usuarios. Nuestra experiencia con la prohibición de las drogas no es sino una réplica de nuestra experiencia con la prohibición del alcohol.(...) La descriminalización de las drogas es hoy todavía más urgente que en 1972, pero debemos reconocer que el daño causado en el entretanto no puede ser borrado, por lo menos no inmediatamente. Posponer la descriminalización sólo empeorará el problema y lo hará menos tratable.»

Más de quince años perdidos, miles de muertos y encarcelados, los cárteles locales se han convertido en imperios transnacionales que controlan la política, the economy, justice and the army of some states How quickly the world governments to reason? Impossible to know.

Open Letter from Milton Friedman to William Bennet , Office of National Drug Control United States. Foreword

Friedman for "After Prohibition: An adult approach to drug policy in the XXI century"

Who benefits and who harms of marijuana prohibition?

liberalismo.org interview with Friedman